A Monash panel, sponsored by the Social Aesthetic Research Unit, is appearing at the Art.Media.Design | Writing Intersections Conference, Swinburne University of Technology, November 18-19.
The panel will present a roundtable session on the contribution of ’place-image-journey-locus’, ’things-artefacts-objects-design’ and ‘body-theatre-performance-space’ to the act of creation and its representation. The panelists will discuss:
Janine Burke, ‘Writing Intimate Space’
Creativity is a place. Memory is an image. The artistic process itself is a journey, a specific one, the return to a lost and cherished childhood realm, the original source of inspiration and identity. For the case studies I investigate – Georgia O’Keeffe, Claude Monet and Emily Kame Kngwarreye – re-creating Eden was a life-changing, art-making, healing rite that provides a map of their careers and an index of their subject matter.
Eduardo de la Fuente, ‘Bridges, Doors, Handles, Picture Frames and Ruins: Georg Simmel and an Artefactual Theory of Communication’
We are what we hold, rather than what we say. The paper examines the central place of things and artefacts in human communication, and the role that objects—as externalizations of the self, consumption and identity—play in aesthetic experience.
Peter Snow, ‘Theatre Performs Culture’
Performances are a central means by which cultures bring themselves into being. Performances, in their liveness, their ephemerality, and their power to transform, are thus a key way in which cultures acknowledge, negotiate and embody their propensity for living and dying every moment. Conjectures about what performance is, often spill over into speculations about what performance is for and, therefore, how performances should be carried out. Ontological issues appear to have ethical and political corollaries when considering performance. If cultures continually live and die, along with their embodiments in performances, so artists who are mindful of this transience will work accordingly, knowing that their work is as strong as the moment it is created, and as fleeting as the moment it passes. Perhaps those who create social events do likewise, mindful that societies, while appearing relatively stable and lasting, are also ephemeral and transient. If it is the case that performance(s) bring culture(s) into being, maybe this is also true for society/ies. Perhaps what makes society possible is that performances, and performance, bring societies, and therefore society, into being.
Peter Murphy, ‘Writing About What Cannot Be Written About’
‘Writing’ is often taken as a model of the creative process. It is widely assumed, not least by writers themselves, that creation in general has features that we readily associate with language, logic or discourse. ‘Text’, ‘textuality’, and ‘inter-textuality’ became very popular metaphors in the second half of the twentieth century to explain a large variety of cultural and artistic phenomenon. This echoed the influence of linguistic philosophy and linguistic models in twentieth-century cultural theory. The paper takes issue with the idea that the creative component of culture is structured on the model of language. It suggests rather that acts of imagination in fact look more like object creation and design, than speaking and writing. Ironically, this is true of speaking and writing as much as it is of painting or sculpture. The presentation explores the idea of the imagination as a form or process of object creation, and that imaginative writing, whether in the arts or the sciences, is closer in nature to an act of sculpture or work of design than it is to a speech act or a discursive text.