Skip to the content | Change text size

Question Database: Ancient Philosophy: Plato

Meno

What kind of reasoned explanation gets us to knowledge? Two examples:

1. I believe that my car needs a new radiator because my dad said so, and the explanation seemed to make sense to me at the time.

2. The specialist says I have some auto immunity issue, and says sensible sounding things about proteins in the blood and why I ought to avoid certain foods.

The justifications seem relevant to the content of the belief, and consistent with other beliefs. At the time, I followed the explanations (but no longer recall them). Are these justified true beliefs knowledge?


Plato evidently doesn’t think these are knowledge, because:

A. I no longer remember the explanation that my Dad and the doctor gave, which I followed at the time. I did know then, but now I don’t.

B. Even when they explained things to me, I didn’t have knowledge, since it just sounded ok to me, but I didn’t actually get it.

C. Plato has an elevated, Socratic conception of knowledge, such that one only knows things like mathematical or geometrical truths.

D. Somebody else gave me the info./p>

Answer: B

Topic:

Meno, knowledge, justified true belief

Course Level:

Second year ancient philosophy

Notes:

Possible reasons for taking (B) to be the right answer:

If I really understood the explanation, then, according to Plato, I wouldn’t forget again (remember, he thinks knowledge is unlike the statues of Daedelus, in being more stable)

I just ‘followed’ the explanations, rather passively. No active learning. Evidence: I couldn’t then turn around and explain it to somebody else.