?1Veerman, Arja Andriessen, Jerry Kanselaar, Gellof20021Collaborative argumentation in academic education155-186Instructional Science303collaborative learning collaborative argumentation computer-supported collaborative learning instructional design question asking study studies review computer question-asking FILEDThe general purpose of this research is to discover principles for the design of educational tasks that provoke collaborative argumentation. The specific research question concentrates on the relationship between question asking and argumentation and is examined in three different collaborative learning tasks involving advanced university students. These studies aim at providing criteria for organising educational situations that elicit argumentation during which opinions change and new knowledge is being created, within constraints (course duration, exam criteria, student expectations) set by current higher education. We discuss some factors influencing argumentation (the role of the student, peer, tutor, task, instruction and medium) and specific attention is paid to question asking. Then we report three studies conducted at our educational department. These studies involve comparable students, a similar domain, but differ in many other respects: the mode of communication (oral, typewritten), the presence of the tutor, instruction on argumentation and/or question asking, assigned task goals (competition, consensus), and the type of required outcome. Each study reveals prominence of different types of questions and question generation mechanisms. In addition, the relations found between question asking and argumentation change between studies. In comparing and interpreting these studies, we discuss results in the light of provoking collaborative argumentation in regular academic learning situations.]Kluwer Online: http://www.kluweronline.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/issn/0020-4277/contentsMatheson 371.305 I591096250434Veerman2002.pdf?Houston, Ken Lazenbatt, Anne1996IThe introduction and evaluation of peer-tutoring in undergraduate courses39-50'Journal of Further and Higher Education201peer-tutoring study FILED SPRING 1996Metapress: http://ezproxy-authcate.lib.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/authcate.pl?url=http://www.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0309-877X 378.05 J86.1?Mazur, E1997!Peer Instruction: A User's Manual Saddle River Prentice HallVpeer instruction active learning collaborative learning FILED (extracts) peer-tutoring |?&Heiman, Marcia Ed Slomianko, Joshua Ed1987_Thinking Skills Instruction: Concepts and Techniques. Building Students' Thinking Skills SeriesISBN-0-8106-0201-6. 313EDRS Price - MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS.; NEA Professional Library, P.O. Box 509, West Haven, CT (Stock No. 0201-6, $15.95).Creative Thinking; *Critical Thinking; *Curriculum Development; Decision Making; Elementary Secondary Education; Learning Strategies; *Problem Solving; Teaching Methods Higher Order Skills; Thinking across the Curriculum; *Thinking Skills8 This book is a collection of essays on thinking skills instruction and includes the following chapters and their authors: "Encounter with Thinking" (H. Anderson); "Thinking Skills: Neither an Add-on nor a Quick Fix" (A. Costa); "Teaching for Thinking, of Thinking, and about Thinking" (J. McTighe); "Thinking and Curriculum: Critical Crossroads for Educational Change" (B. Presseisen); "Critical Thinking and the Curriculum" (R. Ennis); "Conversation with David N. Perkins"; "Critical Thinking Attitudes and the Transfer Question" (A. Swartz); "Thinking across the Disciplines: Methods and Strategies to Promote Higher-Order Thinking in Every Classroom" (D. Halpern); "Practice Is Not Enough" (B. Beyer); "Learning to Learn: Improving Thinking Skills across the Curriculum" (M. Heiman); "A Strategy for Developing Dialectical Thinking Skills" (J. Rudinow and R. Paul); "Strategies for Active Involvement in Problem Solving" (J. Karmos and A. Karmos); "Restructuring What We Teach to Teach for Critical Thinking" (R. Swartz); "Developing Metacognition in Composition with Peer Response Groups" (L. Meeks); "Basics in Bloom" (N. Hoelzel); "Teaching Thinking to Teach Literature while Teaching Literature to Teach Thinking" (N. Yeager); "Using Thinking Skills in Modified ESL" (P. Jaynes); "The Direct Teaching of Analysis" (R. Charlton); "Conversation with Arthur Whimbey"; "Teaching Precise Processing through Writing Instruction" (K. Didsbury); "Thinking about Learning: An Anarchistic Approach to Teaching Problem Solving" (J. Lochhead); "Holistic Thinking Skills Instruction: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Intellectual Performance" (W. Sadler, Jr.); "Cognitive Modifiability in Adolescence: Cognitive Structure and Effects of Intervention" (R. Feuerstein and others); "Using Vocabulary Study to Generate Thinking" (E. Roberts); "Teaching Critical Thinking: Are We Making Critical Mistakes? Possible Solutions" (R. Sternberg); "The Direct Teaching of Thinking as a Skill" (E. de Bono); "Developing Students' Thinking Skills through Multiple Perspectives" (R. Rubin); "Developing Thinking Skills in Music Rehearsal Class" (D. Reahm); "Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Home Economics: A Lesson Plan" (N. Watts); "Using Literature to Develop Critical Thinking Skills" (M. Tymoczko); "Questioning in a Writing Program to Develop Thinking" (P. Flemming); "Simulation and Thinking" (R. Levitsky); "The Pre-Contact Time American Indian: A Study in the Meaning and Development of Culture--A Teaching Unit" (J. Feeser); "Think Metric" (D. Gallo); and "The Art of Socratic Reasoning" (E. Skorpen). (MS)j1987. Clearinghouse: CS009660 English 010 Books; 052 Guides: Classroom: Teacher U.S.; District of Columbia 0810602016ED306559?,Poulis, J. Massen, C. Robens, E. Gilbert, M.1998.Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback439-441American Journal of Physics66peer instruction?Shapiro, Joel A.1997HElectronic student response found feasible in large science lecture hall408-412#Journal of College Science Teaching26peer instructionD?#Burnstein, Ray A. Lederman, Leon M.2001)Using wireless keypads in lecture classes8-11The Physics Teacher39peer i?Duncan, Douglas2005Clickers in the classroom San FranciscoPearson Education Inc.peer instruction1144634454Clickers-TOC.pdf?Duncan, Douglas2005'7 things you should know about clickersEducause Learning Initiativepeer instructionwww.educause.edu/eli1144476003Clickers.pdf O?(Cross, K. Patricia Steadman, Mimi Harris1996=Classroom research : implementing the scholarship of teaching xxii, 264-Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series San Francisco Jossey-Bass1stUCollege teaching United States. Case method. College teaching Research United States.!Classroom Assessment Techniques offers faculty members a set of tools to identify what is working and what is not in their classrooms and the companion volume Classroom Research details a collaborative process for investigating teaching and learning issues. This process engages teachers in problem-based discussions, integrates their teaching experience with recent research and theory on learning, and gives examples of Classroom Assessment and Classroom Research projects that can be carried out in any classroom. It provides a pathway into "the scholarship of teaching.". Designed to be used by faculty members in groups and in workshops, Classroom Research's case method approach illustrates ways to rhink about a variety of common learning issues. The cases show students in the process of learning, clearly illustrate their problems and perceptions, and focus on long-term issues such as memory, motivation, deep and surface learning, metacognition, learning strategies, gender issues, intellectual development, and critical thinking. The authors designed the discussion questions to provoke a lively exchange of ideas and interpretations, and they show how faculty can acquire the critical knowledge -from research and literature as well as from students themselves - to determine some possible solutions.)96010108 K. Patricia Cross, Mimi Harris Steadman. Includes bibliographical references (p. 235-252) and index. Introduction to classroom research -- The Leslies : learning issues : prerequisite knowledge, metacognition and learning strategies, self-confidence and motivation -- The captive audience : learning issues : learning goals, deep and surface learning, student ratings of instruction -- But is it working? : learning issues : peer learning, intellectual development and critical thinking -- The challenge : designing your own classroom research.0787902888 (acid-free paper)^Matheson Library Main Collection 378.125 C951C Caulfield Library -- Level 4 378.125 C951C 1996? 4Brandford, John D. Brown, Ann L, Cocking, Rodney R.19996How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school.Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.Washington, D.C.National Academy Presspeer instruction$http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6160.htmlAvailable free online?KMaloney, David P. O'Kuma, Thomas L. Hieggelke, Curtis J. van Heuvelen, Alan2001FSurveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism.S1-23#American Journal of Physics, suppl.69peer instruction?Boyle, J. Nicol, D.2003cUsing classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings43-57*Association of Learning Technology Journal11peer instruction ?Allen, Deborah Tanner, Kimberly2005nInfusing Active Learning into the Large-enrollment Biology Class: Seven Strategies, from the Simple to Complex262-268Cell Biology Education4 Winter 2005peer instruction1144631782Allen-Tanner.pdf?Chew, Stephen L.2004*Using concepTests for formative assessment10-12Psychology Teacher Network141peer instructionsD?Chew, Stephen L.20052Student misperceptions in the psychology classroom)Essays from e-xcellence in teaching, 2004)Saville, B. K. Zinn, T. E. Hevern, V. W.Retrieved 9th April, 2006 from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology Web site: http://teachpsych.lemoyne.edu/teachpsych/eit/eit2004/index.htmlpeer instruction1144633524Psych.pdfd? Green, P.2003Peer Instruction for Astronomy Prentice-Hallpeer instruction?LLandis, C.R. Ellis, A.B. Lisensky, G.C. Lorenz, J.K. Meeker, K. Wamser, C.C.2001:Chemistry ConcepTests: A Pathway to Interactive Classrooms Prentice-Hallpeer instruction D?"Loman, David O. Robinson, Maria K.20047Using ConcepTests in Single and Multivariable Calculus.L16th Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate MathematicsNew YorkAddison Wesleypeer instruction1144634572Calculus.pdf?5McConnell, David A Steer, David N Owens, Katharine D2003KAssessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses.205-216Journal of GeoScience Education512peer instruction1144633190GeoSciences.pdfF? Piepmeier, E.1998eUse of concepTests in a large lecture course to provide active student involvement and peer teaching.,American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education62peer instruction1144633335Pharm.pdf?Robertson, L. J.2000ITwelve tips for using a computerised interactive audience response system237-239Medical Teacher223peer instruction1144633922Robertson.pdfD?3Wulff, Donald H. Nyquist, Jody D. Abbott, Robert D.1987&Students' Perceptions of Large ClassesTeaching Large Classes Well M. E. WeimerSan Francisco, CA Jossey-Basspeer instructionw?!Carbone, Elisa Greenberg, James1998GTeaching Large Classes: Unpacking the Problem and Responding Creatively11-326aTo Improve the Academy 1998, Resources for Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development.17Kaplan, Matthew[A Publication of the Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.peer instructionF? Cline, Kelly2006Classroom voting in calculus!Mathematics Teacher (forthcoming)IPreprint: http://www.carroll.edu/~kcline/Classroom-Voting-in-Calculus.htmpeer instruction1144635598Cline.pdf? Ramsland, K.19865Teaching Critical Reasoning Through Group Competition319-26Teaching Philosophy94Peer instruction philosophy4111280128Ramsland.pdf?Postow, B. C.19759Independent discussion groups for Introductory Philosophy51-4Teaching Philosophy11!FILED peer instruction philosophy?Harrison, David M.2004IAsk the audience: Using in-class questions to increase student engagement$Unpublished power point presentationPeer instruction2758485760AskTheAudience-1.pdfF?6Brissenden, Gina Slater, Timothy F. Mathieu, Robert D.2002VThe Role of Assessment in the Development of the College Introductory Astronomy CourseAstronomy Education Review11#Peer instruction student assessment0125704192Slater.pdfF? Ellis, A.B.1997?Elements of curriculum reform: putting solids in the foundationJournal of Chemical Education749Peer instruction1423545856Ellis.pdfF?Handelsman, Jo Mebert-May, Diane Beichner, Robert Bruns, Peter Chang, Amy DeHaan, Robert Gentile, Jim Lauffer, Sarah Stewart, James Tilghman, Shirely M. Wood, William B.2004Scientific TeachingScience304Peer instruction FILED1289603840cientificTeaching.pdf?Thomason, Neil19908Making Student Groups Work: "To teach is to learn twice"111-125Teaching Philosophy132GPeer instruction group Activities Cooperative learning philosophy FILED?Thomason, Neil1995%Philosophy Discussions With Less B.S.15-30Teaching Philosophy181GFILED Peer instruction group activities cooperative learning philosophyD?Foyle, Douglas C.19954Think-Pair-Share and the Graduate Teaching Assistant6Interactive Learning in the HIgher Education ClassroomFoyle, Harvey C.Washington D.C.National Education Association;FILED Peer instruction Active learning cooperative learning? Wilson, Arnold1989DDemonstrating Philosophy: Novel Ways to Teach Philosophical ConceptsUniversity Press of America%peer instruction philosophy FILED TOC!Articles from Teaching PhilosophyD?Seech, Zachary19897Philosophical chairs: a format for classroom discussionDDemonstrating Philosophy: Novel Ways to Teach Philosophical ConceptsWilson, ArnoldUniversity Press of America(peer instruction philosophy UNREAD FILED?Wilson, Arnold1989Getting into an argument93-4DDemonstrating Philosophy: Novel Ways to Teach Philosophical ConceptsWilson, ArnoldUniversity Press of America,Peer instruction logic games exercises FILED? Yarvin, Herb1976!Asking Questions: Some Techniques441-5Teaching Philosophy14(FILED UNREAD Peer instruction philosophyl,?;Sharma, Manjula D. Khachan, Joe Chan, Ben O'Byrne, John 2005lAn investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes137-154.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology2121peer instruction anonymity Voting mechanism FILED2http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/sharma.htmlF?Fernald, Peter S.2004_The Monte Carlo Quiz. Encouraging punctual completion and deep processing of assigned readings.College Teaching523Peer instruction Reading FILED0923795200MCQuiz.pdf{O? Morton, Adam2004>Philosophy in practice : an introduction to the main questions xv, 446 p. Malden, MABlackwell Pub.2ndPeer instructionhAdam Morton. ill.; 25 cm. Certainty and doubt -- Sources of certainty -- Rationalism -- Rationalism versus relativism in morals -- Induction -- The retreat from certainty -- Utilitarianism -- Kantian ethics -- Empiricism -- Beyond empiricism -- Objectivity. -- Materialism (versus) dualism -- Morality for naturalists -- Deep illusions -- Realism (& idealism).4140511617X (alk. paper) 1405116188 (pbk. alk. paper)Matheson 100 M889P 20042235938048MORTON.pdfO?JAnderson, Tony Howe, Christine Soden, Rebecca Halliday, John Low, Jennifer2001[Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students1-32Instructional Science291Rpeer-tutoring study studies critical thinking modelling critiquing exercises FILED2001/1>A teaching programme is reported in which critical thinking skills (in the sense of reasoned justification of arguments; see Kuhn, 1991, 1993) were taught. The principal aims of the study were to develop, implement and evaluate a programme for teaching evidence-based justification to vocational education students in Further Education colleges. Teaching was via modelling and peer-based critiquing exercises in the context of the students' project work. Eighty-four Further Education college students underwent a 10-session teaching intervention which dovetailed with their Additional Assessment integrative project work. Students took part in peer-based exercises in which they learned to critique imaginary examples of project outlines and plans, followed by similar peer-based critiquing of each others' proposed projects. Analysis of the students' dialogues with each other indicated that they had learned the importance of justifying arguments, and content analysis of their written work indicated that they engaged in justification of their arguments to a significantly greater degree than control groups. Several key variables in the dialogues correlated positively with justification in the written work, suggesting that the dialogue had impacted on the written work. However, justification tended to be of a weak kind (using anecdotes or experience-based generalisations), and strong (i.e. formal research-based) evidence remained relatively infrequent and sometimes inappropriately used. A psychometric test of general critical thinking skills showed no evidence of transfer of learning.Kluwer Online: http://www.kluweronline.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/issn/0020-4277/contents http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026471702353 TY - JOURMatheson 371.305 I591096251433Anderson2001.pdf?Anderson, Tony Soden, Rebecca2001=Peer Interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills37-40 Pyschology Learning and Teaching119peer-tutoring peer instruction study studies review FILED June 2001X?Hake, Richard R1998Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses64-74 Am. J. Phys.66Einteractive engagement study physics normalized gain peer instructionhake98$http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/1133570238Hake-98.pdfF?Hake, Richard R20020Lessons from the physics education reform effortConservation Ecology5284study physics active learning peer instruction FILEDhake021http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art28/1133572034Hake-02.pdf?Smith, Daryl G.19774College Classroom Interactions and Critical Thinking180-190!Journal of Educational Psychology6923FILED study peer instruction interactive engagement?Brightman, Harvey J.20050GSU Master Teacher Program: On Critical ThinkingGeorgia State University-peer instruction interactive engagement FILED(http://www2.gsu.edu/~dschjb/wwwcrit.html1136767648Brightman.pdfF?Gokhale, Anuradha A.19951Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical ThinkingJournal of Technology Education713peer instruction study FILED interactive engagement1136770555Gokhale.pdf?Crouch, Catherine H. Mazur, E20015Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results970-977American Journal of Physics6993FILED study peer instruction interactive engagement!1136772198MazurActiveLearning.pdf?,Fagen, Adam P. Crouch, Catherine H. Mazur, E20024Peer instruction: results from a range of classrooms206-9The Physics Teacher40April3FILED peer instruction interactive engagement study!1136772233MazurActiveLearning.pdf? Meltzer, David E. Manivannan, K.2002PTransforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture639-654American Journal of Physics7063FILED interactive engagement peer instruction study"11399025221135141944Meltzer-02.pdfIF?Johnston, Susan Cooper, Jim1997PQuick-thinks: active-thinking tasks in lecture classes and televised instruction4Cooperative learning and college teaching newsletter81-peer instruction interactive engagement FILED;http://www.csudh.edu/SOE/cl_network/InteractiveLecture.html1136770605Johnston.pdf`?BNovak, Gregor Patterson, Evelyn Gavrin, Andrew Christian, Wolfgang1999BJust-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning and Web TechnologyUpper Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Halliinteractive engagement peer instruction active learning just in time teaching just-in-time teaching FILED*http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/what.html ?University of Minnesota.Minnesota Model for Large Introductory CoursesBUniversity of Minnesota Physics Education Research and Development*active learning peer instruction FILED (M)>http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research/MNModel/MMt.html?*Johnson, D. W. Johnson, R. T. Smith, K. A.19915Active Learning: Cooperation in the college classroom Edina, MNInteraction Book Company7active learning peer instruction interactive engagementF? Novak, Gregor1999What is Just-in-time Teaching?Just-in-time Teaching websiteiinteractive engagement peer instruction active learning just in time teaching just-in-time teaching FILED*http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/what.html1136766270Jitt1.pdfF?Gavrin, Andrew1999JiTT Learning GoalsJust-in-time Teaching websiteqinteractive engagement peer instruction active learning just in time teaching just-in-time teaching FILED (Novak)+http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/goals.html1136766444Jitt2.pdfF? Novak, Gregor1999!An overview of the JiTT ResourcesJust-in-time Teaching websiteiinteractive engagement peer instruction active learning just in time teaching just-in-time teaching FILED.http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/resoures.html1136766515Jitt3.pdf?Smith, Karl A.20011Strategies for engaging students in large classesUniverisity of Minnesota7active learning internative engagement peer instructionhttp://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith1136768048umnadt401ho.pdf?2Ellis, Arthur B. Landis, Clark R. Meeker, Kathleen2005ConcepTest CAT20058Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-MadisonBinteractive engagement active learning concepTest peer instruction0164502528136763? Manivannan, K.2004SUsing Interactive Teaching Techniques to Promote Active Learning in College ClassesSMSUNactive learning interactive engagement collaborative learning peer instructionBReport of a 2003-4 Project in the SMSU Teaching Fellowship Program1136770859Mannivanan.pdf7?ESmith, Karl A. Sheppard, Sheri D. Johnson, David W. Johnson, Roger T.20053Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices87-101 Journal of Engineering EducationJanuarySactive learning interactive engagement collaborative argumentation peer instruction1136771104Smith-etal.pdfA?Nicol, David J. Boyle, James T.2003Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in the large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom458-473Studies in Higher Education284=interactive engagement active learning peer instruction study1136771821nicol2.pdf?University of Minnesota Example LabBUniversity of Minnesota Physics Education Research and DevelopmentAactive learning peer instruction collaborative learning FILED (M)1136772505MinnessotaLab1.pdf$?.Heller, Patricia Keith, Ronald Anderson, Scott1992gTeaching problem solving through coooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving627-636American Journal of Physics607CFILED collaborative learning peer instruction active learning study?!Heller, Patricia Hollabaugh, Mark1992hTeaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2. Designing problems and structuring groups637-644American Journal of Physics607Ccollaborative learning peer instruction active learning FILED study$? "McDermott, L. C. Shaffer, Peter S.2002-3+Notes on: Tutorials in Introductory Physics7Physics Education Group at the University of WashingtonIactive learning peer instruction university of washington tutorials FILED2http://www.phys.washington.edu/groups/peg/tut.html?+Stuart, S. A. J. Brown, M. I. Draper, S. W.2004SUsing an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practicioner's application95-102%Journal of Computer Assisted Learning20'interactive engagement peer instruction0557342720stuartbrown.pdf?Draper, S. W. Brown, M. I.2004FIncreasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system81-94%Journal of Computer Assisted Learning20'peer instruction interactive engagement1143696141Draper-Brown.pdf?Kennedy, G. E. Cutts, Q. I.2005`The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes260-268%Journal of Computer Assisted Learning21-peer instruction interactive engagement FILED 1143696263Kenneddyl?Bligh, Donald A.1998What's the use of lectures?ExeterIntellect Books0Lectures interactive engagement peer instruction8B72-27171 [by] Donald A. Bligh Bibliography: p. 225-248.Peninsula Library Store 371.396 B648.1 Gippsland Library 378.1796 BLI Pharmacy Library Basement 378.1796 B648 Matheson Library Main Collection 371.33 B648WVD?Cutts, Q. I. Kennedy, G. E.2005@Connecting Learning Environments Using Electronic Voting Systems+Australasian Computing Education ConferenceYoung, Alison Tolhurst, DeniseNewcastle, AustraliaGConferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, vol. 42peer instruction1143861511CRPITV42Cutts.pdfD?0Cutts, Q. I. Carbone, Angela van Haaster, Kelsey2004UUsing an electronic voting system to promote active reflection on coursework feedback2International conference on computers in educationMelbourne, Australiapeer instruction1143861740ICCE04QC.pdfR?4Ronald N Cortright Heidi L Collins Stephen E DiCarlo2005NPeer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems107 Advances in Physiology Education292\Cooperative learning Peer instruction Science education Problem solving Anatomy & physiologyJun 2005iStudents must be able to interpret, relate, and incorporate new information with existing knowledge and apply the new information to solve novel problems. Peer instruction is a cooperative learning technique that promotes critical thinking, problem solving, and decision-making skills. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that peer instruction enhances meaningful learning or transfer, defined as the student's ability to solve novel problems or the ability to extend what has been learned in one context to new contexts. To test this hypothesis, our undergraduate exercise physiology class of 38 students was randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 19) and group B (n = 19). A randomized crossover design in which students either answered questions individually or during peer instruction was used to control for time and order effects. The first factor that influences meaningful learning is the degree of mastery of the original material. Importantly, peer instruction significantly enhanced mastery of the original material. Furthermore, the student's ability to solve novel problems was significantly enhanced following peer instruction. Thus pausing two to three times during a 50-min class to allow peer instruction enhanced the mastery of the original material and enhanced meaningful learning, i.e., the student's ability to solve novel problems. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]http://ezproxy-authcate.lib.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/authcate.pl?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=970475911&Fmt=7&clientId=16397&RQT=309&VName=PQD TY - JOUR10434046z?KMcConnell, David A Steer, David N Owens, Katharine D Knott, Jeffrey R et al2006kUsing Conceptests to Assess and Improve Student Conceptual Understanding in Introductory Geoscience Courses61Journal of Geoscience Education541KGeology Curricula Educational evaluation Tests peer instruction PerceptionsJan 2006{Conceptests are higher-order multiple-choice questions that focus on one key concept of an instructor's major learning goals for a lesson. When coupled with student interaction through peer instruction, conceptests represent a rapid method of formative assessment of student understanding, require minimal changes to the instructional environment and introduce many of the recognized principles of effective teaching that enhance student learning. In this study, instructors from several different institutions developed over 300 conceptests for the geosciences. These instructors then used this suite of concept questions in a wide range of classroom settings, including large introductory general education Earth Science courses for non-majors at open enrollment institutions, smaller physical geology classes suitable for majors at private colleges, and in introductory geology laboratory settings. Results of pre- and post-class Geoscience Concept Inventory (GCI) testing and qualitative feedback from students and instructors showed that conceptests increased attendance, improved student satisfaction, and enhanced student achievement. Participating instructors found implementation of conceptests into their classes straightforward and required less than 30 minutes of preparation per class. The conceptest question database is available on-line for geoscience instructors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]http://ezproxy-authcate.lib.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/authcate.pl?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=998188631&Fmt=7&clientId=16397&RQT=309&VName=PQD TY - JOUR?.Vazgen Zakaryan Richard Bliss Narine Sarvazyan2005#"Non-Trivial Pursuit of Physiology"11 Advances in Physiology Education291LScience education Anatomy & physiology Peers Software Games peer instructionMar 20056This article describes a novel way to conduct a review session that combines interactivity, team learning, and peer-to-peer instruction. It uses the format of the familiar game "Trivial Pursuit." To facilitate the game process and to encourage its use by others, we have developed custom software. It allows an instructor to run the game from the podium and to input questions/answers for a particular block or other area to be reviewed. In addition to the software itself, the online supplement (http://advan.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00031.2004/DC1) contains 100 sample questions and answers written for the cardiovascular physiology review session. The developed game format and its software add to the arsenal of educational tools that can be used to enrich students' learning experiences. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]http://ezproxy-authcate.lib.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/authcate.pl?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=970471301&Fmt=7&clientId=16397&RQT=309&VName=PQD TY - JOUR10434046:?%Rao, Sumangala P. DiCarlo, Stephen E.20001Peer Instruction Improves Performance on Quizzes.51-55 Advances in Physiology Education241peer instruction 2000-00-00:Applies Benson's think-pair-share and Mazur's peer instruction techniques to enhance student involvement during the respiratory component of the medical physiology class. Investigates changes in students' level of understanding and ability to synthesize and integrate material. Includes 15 references. (Author/YDS)EJ647834TY - JAISSN-1043-40461144633972Sum.pdffF?Goldman, Ralph M. And Others1975oSmall Groups and the Introductory Course in American Politics: An experiment in the Organization of InstructionTeaching Political Science3, 1, 37-62, Oct 75peer instruction 1975-00-009This article provides an overview of peer instruction, presents some observations growing out of its use at three institutions over the past three years, and anchors these observations in a belief that peer instruction is more compatible with emerging needs and abilities of American college students. (Author/ND)EJ126908 TY - GENTeaching Political Science(F?0Jones, Linda R. Miller, Andrew G. Watts, J. Fred2001FConceptual Teaching and Quantitative Problem Solving: Friends or Foes?:Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teachingv10 n3 p109-16 Spr 2001ANew Forums Press, Inc., P.O. Box 876, Stillwater, OK 74076 ($35).9Conceptual Approach Student Satisfaction peer instruction 2001-00-00`Compared the quantitative problem-solving skills of conceptually-taught and traditionally-taught introductory physics students. Found that students taught conceptually through peer instruction performed significantly better on quantitative exam questions for two out of three exams. However, the conceptually taught students were not as satisfied. (EV)EJ652333TY - JA:Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College TeachingF?2Van Dijk, L. A. Van Den Berg, G. C. Van Keulen, H.2001.Interactive Lectures in Engineering Education.)European Journal of Engineering Educationv26 n1 p15-28 Mar 20011Interactive Teaching Netherlands peer instruction 2001-00-00QDiscusses an alternative approach to lecturing, the interactive lecture. Examines the effects of interactive teaching in lectures using an interactive voting system and peer instruction on the attainment of learning objectives, student motivation, and student perception of the instruction offered. (Contains 20 references.) (Author/YDS)EJ638131TY - JAISSN-0304-3797)European Journal of Engineering Education4?Watermeier, Daniel J.1982^The Avant-Garde (1890-1925): An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Humanities through the Arts.268-80BInnovative Higher Education: The Journal of Nontraditional Studies64OCourse Design State University of New York Coll at Plattsburgh peer instruction 1982-00-00bA course focusing on the avant-garde epoch and presenting an in-depth look at the arts of the period is described. Peer instruction, individualized instruction, experiential learning, and contracts were incorporated into a traditional lecture format. Student characteristics and attitudes were monitored. Course successes and problems are outlined. (MSE)EJ272852TY - JACAlternative Higher Education: The Journal of Nontraditional Studi? Pilzer, Scott2001,Peer Instruction in Physics and Mathematics.185-92Primus111peer instructionExplores a method of teaching called Peer Instruction. Describes how Peer Instruction was implemented in physics and summarizes the results. Discusses the way in which Peer Instruction was modified to be used in an introductory single variable calculus course. (Author/ASK)EJ628572TY - JAISSN-1051-1970PrimusF?$Cox, Anne J. Junkin, William F., III2002AEnhanced Student Learning in the Introductory Physics Laboratory.Physics Educationv37 n1 p37-44 Jan 2002peer instruction 2002-00-00}Describes taking laboratory experiments, modifying them to include aspects of peer instruction and collaborative learning, and using pre- and post-tests to measure student learning gains in two of these labs. Data indicates that this modification substantially increases student learning-it increases the average student learning gain from pre- to post-test by 50-100%. (Author/MM)EJ641932TY - JAISSN-0031-9120Physics EducationF?Su, Q.2001ATeaching Innovation Using a Computerised Audience Response SystemUnpublished reportpeer instruction1143862329Q-SU1.pdf?$Knight, Jennifer K. Wood, William B.2005Teaching More by Lecturing Less298-310Cell Biology Education4peer instruction114386269305-06-0082.pdf ?%Draper, S. W. Cargill J. Cutts, Q. I.2002-Electronically enhanced classroom interaction13-23.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology18peer instruction2http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/draper.html1143863089Draper2002.pdf?Wit, E.2003OWho wants to be... The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching5-11MSOR Connections32peer instruction4047150080Wit-2003.pdf?McDermott, L. C.1991KMillikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned - closing the gap.391-315American Journal of Physics59peer instruction?McDermott, L. C.1997DBridging the gap between teaching and learning: The role of research139-165;International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education399AIP Conference Proceedingspeer instruction? Redish, E. F.19946Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics796-803American Journal of Physics62peer instruction?&Thornton, Ronald K. Sokoloff, David R.1998Assessing student learning of Newton's Laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and curricula.338-352American Journal of Physics66peer instruction?Lumsden, E. A.1976OUse of student feedback cards for diagnostic purposes during classroom lectures393Improving College and University Teaching Yearbook.1976 CorvallisOregon State U. P.peer instruction?Littauer, Raphael1972KInstructional implications of a low-cost electronic student response system69Educational Technologypeer instructionD? Lyman, F.19929Think-pair-share, thinktrix, thinklinks, and weird facts./Enhancing Thinking Through Cooperative LearningDavidson, N. Worsham, T.New YorkTeacher's College Press!peer instruction think-pair-share?Davidson, Neil Worsham, Toni Maryland Center for Thinking Studies., International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education.,1992/Enhancing thinking through cooperative learningxx, 287New YorkTeachers College Press`Group work in education. Thought and thinking Study and teaching United States. peer instructionedited by Neil Davidson and Toni Worsham. Collection of essays sponsored by the Maryland Center for Thinking Studies and the International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education. Includes bibliographical references and index.60807731587 (alk. paper) 0807731579 (pbk. : alk. paper).Matheson Library Main Collection 371.395 D252E? Wilson, R.C.1986PImproving faculty teaching: Effective use of student evaluations and consultants192-211Journal of Higher Education574peer instruction minute paper interactive engagement|?#Bonwell, Charles C. Eison, James A.1991^Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education ReportsISBN-1-878380-08-7. 121 The George Washington UniversityLpeer instruction College Faculty; Cooperative Learning; Debate; *Discussion (Teaching Technique); Dramatic Play; *Experiential Learning; Faculty Development; Higher Education; *Instructional Effectiveness; Large Group Instruction; *Lecture Method; Peer Teaching; Role Playing; *Teaching Methods; Visual Learning *Active LearningThis monograph examines the nature of active learning at the higher education level, the empirical research on its use, the common obstacles and barriers that give rise to faculty resistance, and how faculty and staff can implement active learning techniques. A preliminary section defines active learning and looks at the current climate surrounding the concept. A second section, entitled "The Modified Lecture" offers ways that teachers can incorporate active learning into their most frequently used format: the lecture. The following section on classroom discussion explains the conditions and techniques needed for the most useful type of exchange. Other ways to promote active learning are also described including: visual learning, writing in class, problem solving, computer-based instruction, cooperative learning, debates, drama, role playing, simulations, games, and peer teaching. A section on obstacles to implementing active learning techniques leads naturally to the final section, "Conclusions and Recommendations," which outlines the roles that each group within the university can play in order to encourage the implementation of active learning strategies. The text includes over 200 references and an index. (JB)1991. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. Clearinghouse: HE024886; Contract or Grant: RI88062014 English 071 ERIC Publications U.S.; Missouri Target Audience: Teachers; Practitioners 1878380087 ED336049 ++?Crouch, Catherine H.1998;Peer Instruction: An interactive approach for large classes37-41Opt. Photonics News99peer instruction? Mazur, E.19974Peer Instruction: getting students to think in class981-88NProceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education399? Hudson, H. T.1985+Teaching physics to a large lecture section81-84The Physics Teacher232peer instruction[http://scitation.aip.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=PHTEAH&Volume=23&Issue=2?VDufresne, Robert J. Gerace, William J. Leonard, William J. Mestre, Jose P. Wenk, Laura1996?Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning3-47(Journal of Computing in Higher Education7peer instruction? Meltzer, David E. Manivannan, K.19962Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes72-76The Physics Teacher34220836105472Meltzer1996.pdf F? Lasry, N.20072Peer Instruction: Comparing Clickers to Flashcards8Unpublished manuscript, submitted to The Physics Teacher_FILED clickers 9347contests.pdfF? Slavin, Alan2001'Peer Instruction in the Lecture SettingPositive Pedagogy11physics_http://www.mcmaster.ca/cll/posped/pastissues/volume.1.no.1/peer.instruction.lecture.setting.htm electronic rF?Simpson, Vicki Oliver, Martin2007YElectronic voting sysems for lectures then and now: a comparison of research and practice187-208.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology232;FILED clickers electronic response systems voting 9esponse systems personal response systems voting mechanis ?mechanism3http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/simpson.html(F? Burton, K.2004HInteractive Powerpoints: Is there any point in giving power to students?,Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law114 Law FILED7http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/indices/iss*+D?McCabe, M. Heal, A. White, ?Stuart, S. A. J. Brown, M. I.2003SAn evaluation of learning resources in the teaching of formal philosophical methods58-68+Association for Learning Technology Journal113 philosophy0506973184sstu.altj.pdf?Brightman, Harvey J.2005'GSU Master Teacher Program: The lectureGeorgia State UniversityFILED$http://www2.gsu/~dschjb/wwwlect.html1136767568GSU.pdf ue/v11n4.html? Barnett, J.2006\Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions474-494.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology224Clickers3http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/barnett.html $nstruction0330656256burnstein.pdf? D'Inverno, R.2003 Making lectures more interactive18-19MSOR Connections31 physics FILED1354371840ectureinteractive.pdf`D? Elliot, C.2002?Case study: Economics lectures using a personal response systemAThe Economics Centre of the Learning and Teaching Support Network economics:http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/sho_xF? Elliot, C.20036Using a personal response system in economics teaching+Intewcase/elliott_prs.htmyrnational Review of Economics Education11FILED economics5http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/iree/i1/elliott.htm?!Freeman, M. Blayney, P. Ginns, P.2006IAnonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems568-580.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology224 FILED anonymity Voting mechanism3http://www.ascilite.org.au/ &m anonymity3813934336PI-Compare.pdf? Halloran, L.1995A comparison of two methods of teaching: Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture285-288Computers in Nursing136 -Cuts-2005.pdf A.20013Integration of group response systems into teaching.Fifth International CAA Conference ProceedingsDanson, M. Eabry, C.Loughborough Universitymaths@h[D?McCabe, M. Heal, A. White, A.2001?New approaches to computer assessment for higher level learningWProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching!University of Klagenfurt Ettp://www.caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2001/proceedings/315 p, AustriamathsIhttp://ltsn.mathstore.ac.uk/articles/maths-caa-series/sep2001/index.shtml1188790784d2.pdf 1857408d2.pdfD?#Purchase, H. Mitchell, C. Ounis, I.2004<Gauging students' understanding through interactive lectures:Proceedings of BNCOD 21. Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceWilliams, H. McKinnon, L.4http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/papers/hcp1.pdf1524710912hcp1.pdf?8Reay, N. Bao, L. Li, P. Warnakululasooriya, R. Baugh, G.2005@Towards the effective use of voting machines in physics lectures554-558American Journal of Physics736physicsD? Williams, D.2002 As seen on TVThe Guardian EducationFILEDDhttp://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,5500,718920,00.html es0300705280avant-garde.pdfD? Williams, J.2003nLearning by remote control: exploring the use of an audience response system as a vehicle for content delivery<Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings ASCILITE Conference9Crisp, G. Thiele, D. Scholten, I. Barker, S. Barron,. J. Adelaide, 7-10 DecemberBhttp://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide03/docs/pdf/739.pdf0250979072739.pdf?Fre y¬eman, M. Blayney, P.2005Promoting interactive in-class learning environments: A comparison of an electronic response system with a traditional alternative23-34vInnovation for Student Engagement in Economics: Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Teaching Economics Conference Cheung, S. L.anonymity Voting mechanismhttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/1991293342?"Harden, R. M. Wayne, E. Donald, G.1968/An audio-visual technique for medical teaching.29-32.Journal of Medical and Biological Illustration181"flashcardF? Prensky, M.20056What can you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything!$Innovate Journal of Online Education115FILED Voting mechanism;http://www.innovateonline.info/indnF?+Dihoff, R. E. Brosvic, G. M. Epstein, M. L.2004xProvision of feedback during preparatio for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedbackThe Psychological Record542scratch cards Voting mechanismIhttp://www.med.wright.edu/aa/facdev/_files/PDFfiles/ImmediateFeedback.pdf3894746880ImmediateFeedback.pdf ajet/ajet22/freeman.html 976Freeman%20Blayney.pdfex.php?view=article&id=83s UNREAD Voting mechanism?"Michaelsen, L. Knight, A. Fink, L.20049Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groupsStylus Publishingscanners Voting mechanism^D? pPenuel, Wil Cliam R. Crawford, Valerie DeBarger, Angela Haydel Boscardin,, Christy Kim Masyn, Katherine Urdan, Tim2005KTeaching with student response system technology. A survey of K-12 Teachers(National Science Foundation grant report9Retrieved from: http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/ 20071493891072tems_Brief_Report.pdf